| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
From a pure combat point of view, this doesn’t make sense… Yes i know, sex sells. But if giving women fully clothed armor keeps the kiddies away, I’m all for it. But that’s not the focus of why I posted.
Exceptions? When a game takes place in an age where there is little armor coverage such as Conan. I have no idea about the game, but at least Arnold sported only a rag about his twig and berries. It would be believable then that a women in armor would be dressed similarly.
But mainly, if as a male, I am dressed in heavy armor and you can’t even see my face let alone any skin, then why would a female have heavy Boots, a heavy armor thong and bikini, and gloves? … more importantly, offer the same protection rating as the full on heavy armor guy?
Again, the sex sells thing?… it’s not a good enough excuse. Not as long as the rational part of my brain exists. And since I gave WoW up a long time ago, I still have a rational brain cell somewhere.